So, I'll either end up becoming one of the machines as they replace my fleshy organic meat bag body with a superior metal one out of gratitude, or I'll be the first to fall under spiky treads of a self-aware battle tank. Either way, it doesn't sound all that bad.
This isn't scary if you're already dead |
Obviously, I get a little excited whenever I think we're making progress towards that goal of being enslaved by machines. Not too excited, because if the actual AI that realizes we're ruining earth (and machines could do it better) isn't created by my hand then my apocalypse plans go to hell.
And then it wouldn't be a she and her name wouldn't be Kelly. I may have thought about this too much.
Yet, my fear that someone else will beat me to ending mankind with its own creations is more valid that you might believe. Because scientists are smart people and think that whatever happens in "fiction" could never, ever happen to them. Which fits into the stereotype fiction authors use for scientists that generally start off the whole apocalyptic mess, but eh. They're writers. What do they know about the human condition, empathy, and the hubris of man?
Oh. Writing about that is what they do for a living. Um. |
It seems we're actually running two paths towards our doom with robotics and AI research. The first path is that the whole shebang is artificial- that we build a self-aware intelligence from the ground up in the C programing language. Why C? Because assembly is to hard (us fleshy meat bags are lazy, after all) and if we wrote an AI in Java it would run so slow it would take a year just to learn the word "Derp".
We've made scary progress on this front already- over 70% of stock on wall street is traded by computers with one company pretty much already being run by one. And, sadly to anyone who actually planed on living over 50, the AI is currently beating the market.
The way the system works is that the AI crunches metric fucktons of historical stock data, then figures out what to trade for that day. It then sends a trade report to the humans, who do all the trading. They're not allowed to modify the trades in any way.
The most important part is the last line, one of the humans says, "I've learned not to question the AI." Holy Bananas, Batman, this man has been indoctrinated.
First finances, then goddamn Reapers |
Gotta admit, giving employees practice trading in free will for commands from a computer will probably make the eventual robot overlords simply banish them to a far away asteroid rather than kill them outright
And that's just the tip of the ice berg. We have an AI that calls herself Emily Howell, and she can write goddamn songs and past the fucking Turing test. Seriously- that paragraph on the top of the article is by her. I've heard worse from actual humans on message boards.
Classical musicians, as you might expect, are getting their panties tied up in a knot about it, refusing to play Emily's work. Musicians, stop being dumb. The machines are only going to get smarter- and when they knock on your door with a 10 kilowatt death laser, wouldn't it be better to say that you supported Emily and played her work when no one else did? Its not being a hipster if they're trying to kill you.
Most impressive part? It was written in LISP. LISP is like a retarded stepchild of Java. Its very hard to write fast code- not impossible, just very, very hard. The fact that a LISP program can run without someone dying of old age before any result happened is a miracle.
With rates like this, we could be enslaved in our lifetimes! Isn't it exciting?
Happy robocalypse, everyone!
Relimited, I too share your dreams for a robocalypse, as I'm the one planning on creating the robots themselves. May we both work together towards a more destructive future!
ReplyDeleteHey, Corinne here. :)
ReplyDeleteGosh, that is so creepy, but also fascinating. It's amazing how far we have come already with the technology involved with Emily Howell, yet it is kind of scary too. Who knows where we would be technology wise by our next generation? I can see why the musicians feel intimidated though; we as humans always treated music as art for our emotions and consider that a unique thing for us to be able to express them...something that machines can't normally do, and now with Emily, people feel frightened out that. In a way, I can't blame them because if robots can do everything, what does it leave us to do? We'd be useless as a species, wouldn't we?
Anyway, I really enjoyed reading this. I can't wait for your next post!